This module provides the opportunity to unpack the theoretical approaches to radicalisation and to relate theory to practice in your working environment. Through research interaction and critique, major local security threats and global security risks will be addressed.
es.buvacare.tk This module will enable you to approach the study of terrorism and counter-terrorism from a practitioner and case study perspective. As the strategic environment changes, intelligence practice and, indeed, concepts of intelligence change. The actors and agents involved in intelligence transform, as do the objects of their concern.
Counter-intelligence strategies and strategies relating to the activities of destabilisation, threat, illicit knowledge acquisition etc. Please note: modules are subject to availability, and may change to suit the needs of industry. Please note that our modules are subject to change - we review the content of our courses regularly, making changes where necessary to improve your experience and graduate prospects. Learning, teaching and assessment includes block teaching using face-to-face and blended methods at the Kedleston Road and Friar Gate Square sites.
These include lecturers, seminars, workshops and practical classes, as well as scenario testing and analysis. There are three modules, which will run separately but overlapping; the latter stages of one coincides with the start of the next.
Each module is assessed formatively through feedback on performance in seminar paper presentations, and critique of approaches to contemporary issues. Summative assessment uses coursework, which includes a portfolio of evidence, an abstract and journal article, critique of theoretical models of terrorism and a position paper. If you do not have a relevant and good degree you will be considered by the Admissions Tutor.
The tutor will consider all the information provided on the application form. If the application demonstrates substantial relevant experience in the criminological or social sector, the Admission Tutor will make an offer if all other conditions in this section are met. If your application provides some evidence of the potential to succeed, but does not clearly disclose that the entry criteria have been met, the Admissions Tutor may undertake an interview to clarify whether or not the student has the potential to succeed on the programme.
This is an exercise of academic judgement, based on a holistic assessment of the individual and the demands of the programme. The nomination letter must explain why the candidate is qualified to be considered for the award. Letter-writing campaigns by multiple nominators are discouraged. Current Executive Board members are excluded from being considered for the Award. The deadline for nominations is June 1 st , The award winner must express willingness to attend the annual Division meeting at ASC.
We will consider both empirical and theoretical contributions, but the subject matter should engage the mission of the division.
Eligibility is limited to papers that are authored by graduate students and have not been previously published or accepted for publication at the time of submission. Papers written with faculty members are not eligible. Students may submit only one paper a year for this competition, and it should not have been submitted for another ASC award in the same year. The submission should include the following:.
Offers an overview of the edited volume that brings together the writings of criminological sociologists to address terrorism and counterterrorism from a variety of theoretical and substantive viewpoints. It calls on sociologists to build on their theoretical and methodological insights to contribute to the broader knowledge of terrorism and counterterrorism. Investigating the applicability of macro-level criminology theory to terrorism: A county-level analysis.
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Specifically, it examines whether county residence is associated with ideologically motivated homicides by right-wing extremists in the contiguous United States. Gupta, Dipak K. Understanding terrorism and political violence: The life cycle of birth, growth, transformation, and demise. Cass Series on Political Violence. New York: Routledge.
Presents different theoretical approaches to examining terrorism, drawing from theories commonly used in economics, psychology, biology, and criminology. It expands on traditional applications of rational choice to allow for altruism as a key motivator for terrorism, and explores how terrorist organizations adapt their strategies to take advantage of changing opportunities.
Criminal Justice. Criminology and transitional justice Access to the complete content on Law Trove requires a subscription or purchase. Performative violence? On the contrary, these findings call into question to what extent we are truly dealing with a particular subtype of offenders—The fact that both Lone Actors themselves and society deem their motive to be ideological, religious, or political, combined with the fact that their attacks have a profound societal impact in terms of the number and seeming randomness of victims and modus operandi, sets them apart from other types of violent offenders. It may be argued that such Lone Actor targets represent either strategic targets, such as military objects, or targets chosen to send out an ideological message of terror—including targets that are associated with a large number of victims to maximize impact.
LaFree, Gary, and Laura Dugan. In Terrorism and counterterrorism today. Edited by Mathieu Deflem, 1— Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance Bingley, UK: Emerald. Takes an inventory on the ways that the field of criminology has accepted scholarship on terrorism as part of the larger field. It also reviews how criminological theory and methodological advances by criminologists have been used to advance the study of terrorism.
Available online through subscription or purchase. Lum, Cynthia, Leslie W.
Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives (Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, Volume 5) [Mathieu Deflem] on baddmeadasamas.ga *FREE* . Generally, terrorism has not been central to. Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Volume 5.
Kennedy, and Alison Sherley. Are counter-terrorism strategies effective?
The results of the Campbell systematic review on counter-terrorism evaluation research. Journal of Experimental Criminology 2.
Provides an overview of the Campbell Collaboration systematic review, which evaluated whether existing counterterrorism strategies have been successful. Notes that there was an almost complete absence of evaluation research on counterterrorism interventions. Stresses the need for researchers, policymakers, and government officials to support evaluation on counterterrorism. Noricks, Darcy M. The root causes of terrorism. In Social science for counterterrorism: Putting the pieces together.